Optimizing 3D Printed Parts for Strength
Whether you are considering 3D printing for prototypes or end use applications, there are many factors you’ll need to consider to ensure the parts are strong enough for your application. In this article, we’ll take a look at the choices which have the greatest impact on part strength:
3D printer settings
Orientation of the part
Note that this guide discusses specific considerations for FDM 3D printing; other 3D printing technologies have differing considerations.
3D Printer Settings
When ordering 3D printed parts, you will typically need to specify an infill percentage. Infill Percentage represents how dense the interior of the model will be. This setting ranges from 0%, a totally hollow model, to 100%, a totally solid model. Infill has the greatest impact of compression strength, since it acts to support the interior of the model.
It seems obvious that a totally solid model would be the best choice for strength, but in practice, choosing a value beyond 60-70% has very little impact on part strength and is usually not worth the additional cost and print time. Especially for larger models with large internal spaces, increasing the infill can have a drastic impact on both the cost and print time. It is important to consider whether the benefits outweigh the drawbacks for your application.
Refer to our Infill Percentage Guide for more details and other considerations for this setting.
Another lesser known setting, the shell thickness, also plays a significant role in part strength. Shell Thickness refers to the thickness of the outer surfaces of the part. Most 3D printing services use a standard thickness of about 1.0 - 1.5 mm, but increasing this setting can greatly increase the tensile strength and impact strength of your parts.
The material your parts are made from also has a significant impact on strength. Typically, 3D printed parts are made from PLA, ABS, or PETG plastics. Its important to consider the types of force that your parts will undergo when deciding on the most suitable material.
For parts which need tensile strength to resist forces pulling on the object, PETG is the strongest option, followed by PLA. ABS is the least effective choice for resisting this type of force. PETG has especially strong bonding between layers and is stronger than other options, which is why it is an especially good choice for thin parts with high strength requirements.
If your parts are subjected to bending forces, ABS is typically the strongest option due to its ductility, followed by PETG. PLA is more rigid and brittle than the other options, which means it is not a good choice for applications that require flexural resistance.
If parts need to resist impact, such as being subjected to falls, ABS or PETG perform about equally. PLA is less suitable for this use due to its rigidity.
For more information on material options and other considerations, refer to our Materials Guide.
Part Orientation, or how the part is positioned on the 3D printer, is a strength consideration unique to 3D printing. To understand why the orientation has such a significant impact, you need to know how parts are produced on an FDM 3D printer. Parts are 3D printed by depositing thin layers of melted plastic at gradually increasing heights in order to form a 3 dimensional part.
Althought the plastic of each layer bonds to the previous layer, the interfaces between these layers are a weak point. When 3D Printed parts crack or break, it is typically between layer lines.
Considering this characteristic of 3D printed parts is especially useful when forces are subjected on the part in a specific direction. For example, if you were designing a bracket for a shelf, you know that the largest forces will be pushing downward where the bracket attaches to the shelf. Using this information, printing the bracket on its side will ensure that the force is not acting along the interfaces between layers.
In cases where you cannot avoid forces acting across layers, consider using PETG since it has the best layer bonding performance of the common materials.
Keep in mind that other factors can also impact the best choice for part orientation. For example, part orientation affects which surfaces of the print will be smoothest. In some cases, part orientation can also affect the cost of the print because more support material may be required to enable a certain part orientation.
While you can use the techniques in this guide to improve the strength of your parts, strength is just one of many factors you are likely thinking about when considering 3D printing for your project. Other requirements, such as the appearance of the parts, cost of production, and timeframe, can require you to make difficult trade-offs. If you aren’t sure how to proceed or just want to run your ideas by someone, we would love to hear about your project and help you figure out the best way to print it!